Sector statutory inspections

Statutory Inspections for Waste & Recycling

LOLER, PUWER, PSSR and COSHH LEV compliance from one independent inspection body.

Waste and recycling carries one of the worst fatal injury rates of any British industry, and HSE's own analysis points at the machinery: poorly guarded equipment and interventions made while it could still move. The baler that jams is the scenario the guidance was written around.

SEIS examines the lifting fleet and inspects the processing plant with guarding and isolation at the centre of the record.

  • Independent & impartial
  • Competent engineer surveyors
  • Reports issued promptly
Highest tier
Fatal injury rates among the worst of any UK sector
12-monthly
Grab cranes, hook lifts and material handlers
Isolation
Stored energy is the recurring factor in machinery deaths
Before reuse
Repaired plant is examined before it returns to service

Waste site cover

  • MRFs, transfer stations and scrap yards
  • Skip hire and collection fleets
  • Processing plant and mobile plant together
  • Examinations around tipping and processing windows
What needs inspecting

What needs inspecting on a waste site

Two regimes divide the yard. LOLER takes everything that lifts: grab cranes, hook lifts, skip loaders and the truck fleet. PUWER takes the processing line, where guarding, isolation and safe intervention arrangements are what the inspection actually interrogates, because that is where this sector's deaths happen.

EquipmentRegimeStatutory positionWhat you receive
Grab cranes and material handlersLOLERThorough examination at least every 12 monthsReport of Thorough Examination
Skip loaders and hook liftsLOLEREvery 12 months as lorry mounted lifting equipmentReport of Thorough Examination
Wheeled loaders and 360s used for liftingLOLERThorough examination where used for object handlingReport of Thorough Examination
Grabs, chains and lifting attachmentsLOLEREvery 6 months as lifting accessoriesReport of Thorough Examination
Balers and compactorsPUWERRisk-based intervals with guarding, interlocks and isolation central to the inspectionWritten record of inspection
Shredders, trommels and picking line conveyorsPUWERRisk-based intervals set from deterioration and useWritten record of inspection
Fork lift trucksLOLEREvery 12 months, with attachments every 6Report of Thorough Examination
Air receivers and compressed airPSSRWritten Scheme of Examination, report within 28 daysWritten Scheme certification and examination report
Picking station dust and fume LEVCOSHHThorough examination and test at least every 14 monthsLEV test report to HSG258

Processing plant under PUWER generates a written inspection record and nothing called a certificate. Plant repaired after damage is examined before it goes back to work, not at the next calendar date.

Sector compliance

Where this sector's risk actually lives

HSE's machinery guidance for waste and recycling was written off the back of a death toll, including eleven killed in baling machines in the recovered paper trade over one fourteen year span. The pattern repeats: a blockage, an intervention, and a machine that could still move.

The baler, the jam and the record

A PUWER inspection on a baler or compactor is only worth having if it interrogates the things that kill: fixed guards in place and secured, interlocks working and unbypassed, isolation that actually dissipates stored hydraulic energy, and access arrangements that make the safe intervention the easy one.

That is what our written record covers, item by item, because a generic tick sheet that never opens the guard question would not have prevented a single one of the incidents the guidance catalogues.

How SEIS works a waste site

Mobile plant and the processing line are examined in one programme built around tipping windows and processing shifts, with night work routine on continuous sites. The grab crane's 12 month cycle, the attachments' 6 month cycle and the baler's risk-based interval land in one calendar.

Defects are graded and walked through with the site manager before we leave, and anything on fire-damaged or repaired plant is re-examined before reuse. Reports sit in the client portal per asset, ready for permit, insurer or EA-adjacent audits.

Sector deep dive
Part 1 of 8

The waste and recycling estate: heavy lifting, hostile duty and the isolation question

Waste and recycling plants run statutory equipment harder than almost any other sector: continuous duty, abrasive and unpredictable material, outdoor exposure and round the clock shifts. The lifting estate, grab cranes, hook lifts, skip loaders and the shed's mobile plant, answers to LOLER on the 6 and 12 month tiers. The processing line, balers, shredders, compactors, trommels and conveyors, answers to PUWER, where the sector's defining questions are guarding and isolation. Air plant answers to PSSR where receivers cross the threshold, and extraction over picking cabins and dusty transfer points answers to COSHH where it controls exposure.

The waste site duty mapLOLERgrabs, hooks: 12m or schemePUWERbalers: isolation provenPSSRcompressor house to schemeCOSHHpicking cabin LEV: 14mTHE CLOCKS12mproveWSE14m
The waste site mapped: grab cranes and hook lifts on LOLER tiers, the processing line under PUWER with guarding and isolation at the centre, air and extraction on their own clocks.

The sector's compliance centre of gravity is the machinery, because that is where its people are hurt. Balers and shredders are built to destroy what enters them, blockages are hourly, and the distance between clearing a jam safely and clearing it fatally is the isolation procedure and the guarding that enforces it. That is why this guide gives the PUWER estate the depth other sectors give their dust or their cranes, and why the written inspection record here is not paperwork but the evidence that the guards, trips and isolation points were proven working, by name and date.

Everything statutory on a waste site fights the same enemy: an operating tempo that treats stopping as failure. The estates that pass are the ones that scheduled the stops first.

Key point

Waste plant works harder than the machinery in any comparable sector: lifting on its tiers, the processing line under PUWER with isolation as the life safety control, and a calendar that schedules the stops before the tempo eats them.

Part 2 of 8

The lifting estate: grabs, hooks and machines that lift all day

The site's lifting equipment carries LOLER duties shaped by continuous duty. Grab cranes feeding the line, hook lift and skip loader vehicles, and material handlers in the shed sit on the 12 month tier, or on an examination scheme a competent person draws where duty justifies different intervals, and this is the sector where such schemes earn their keep, because a grab crane cycling every ninety seconds ages faster than the calendar. Every lifting accessory, chains, grabs where they detach, hooks, slings on the workshop crane, sits on the 6 month tier, and anything that ever lifts a person, the fitters' MEWP included, joins it.

The thorough examination regime meets waste duty with two sector specific disciplines. Exceptional circumstances examinations: LOLER requires re examination after events liable to jeopardise safety, and waste supplies those events, shock loads, fires in the pit, strikes on the grab, so the trigger list belongs in the site's procedures with names against it. And attachment identity: grabs, magnets and clamshells swap between machines, and each carries its own examination and its own report, travelling with the attachment, not the carrier.

Reports to Schedule 1 as everywhere, retained until the next or two years, whichever is later, and read on arrival: a tiered defect on a grab crane feeding the line is tomorrow's stoppage either way, and the cheap version is the planned one.

Key point

Continuous duty justifies examination schemes, exceptional events demand re examination and every swapped attachment carries its own report: waste lifting compliance is LOLER run at the sector's tempo, not the calendar's.

Part 3 of 8

The processing line: guarding, isolation and the inspection record that proves them

Balers, shredders, compactors and conveyors sit under PUWER, and the duties read directly onto the sector's casualty list. Regulation 5 requires the plant maintained in an efficient state and good repair; Regulation 6 requires inspection where deterioration leads to danger, producing a written record, and on a waste line deterioration is the operating condition. The inspection scope that matters is specific and physical: fixed guards present and secured, interlocks proven to stop the machine and hold it stopped, emergency stops reaching every position a person works, and the isolation points, electrical, hydraulic and stored energy, tested to actually isolate.

Isolation is the sector's life safety control because blockages are its routine. The safe system, isolate, lock off, prove dead, then clear, only survives daily use if the hardware supports it: lockable isolators at the machine, personal locks issued by name, stored energy released and proven, and a rule with no exceptions for the two minute jam. The PUWER inspection record is where that system meets evidence: interlocks and isolators proven on a written cycle, dated and signed, so the file shows the controls working, not merely fitted.

Fire adds the sector's other pressure: plant that runs hot in combustible material needs its detection, suppression and housekeeping inside the same written inspection regime, because the machinery record and the fire record fail together when they fail.

Key point

On a waste line the PUWER record is the life safety file: guards secured, interlocks and stops proven, isolation tested and locked off by name, on a written cycle that treats the two minute jam as the moment the system exists for.

Part 4 of 8

Air, dust and the quiet corners of a loud site

Around the headline plant sit the estate's quieter duties. The compressor house feeding the balers' controls and the workshop usually brings receivers over the 250 bar litre threshold, needing a Written Scheme of Examination certified before use and examined to, with reports in 28 days: on a site where everything else is heavy steel, the receiver is the item most often missed precisely because it never complains. Picking cabins and enclosed sort lines bring COSHH duties where ventilation and extraction control dust and bioaerosol exposure; where LEV is the control, it joins the 14 month thorough examination and test cycle, judged against its commissioned performance, with filters and airflows checked between tests.

The mobile fleet completes the map. Loading shovels and telehandlers carry LOLER duties when configured for lifting, their attachments each on the accessory tier, and the whole fleet carries PUWER duties for maintenance, inspection and operator competence regardless. Weighbridges, dock levellers and the workshop's vehicle lifts each have their statutory home, the vehicle lifts on the LOLER tiers with the workshop's slings.

The unifying discipline is the register: on a site this hostile, assets change, move and get replaced constantly, so the statutory register is reconciled to the yard monthly, physically, on foot, or it rots faster than the plant it lists.

Key point

The receiver, the picking cabin extraction and the workshop lifts are the loud site's quiet duties: scheme certified, LEV tested on the 14 month clock, every attachment registered, and the register walked monthly because waste sites change weekly.

Worked example

Worked example: the baler blockage and the interlock that had been bridged for months

A materials recovery facility runs a channel baler around the clock. Blockages at the feed are routine, and the safe system says isolate, lock off, prove dead, clear. One night shift, the clearing takes ninety seconds because it always does: the operator reaches in with the machine live, as the shift has quietly done for months, because the gate interlock that should make that impossible was bridged after it kept faulting in the wet, and production never stopped long enough to fix it properly.

feed gateinterlock bridgedmachine live during the jamThe guard that existed on paper
A bridged interlock, a routine jam and a live machine: the guarding was fitted, the paperwork existed, and the control had been defeated for months in plain sight.

The near miss that surfaces it is unremarkable, a sleeve caught and torn free, and the investigation is not. The bridge is found in five minutes; the PUWER inspection record is found to have ticked the interlock as present without proving it stopped the machine; and the interviews find what the record hid, that everyone on nights knew.

The rebuild is hardware first, culture close behind. The interlock is replaced with one rated for the environment that kept faulting it, the inspection regime changes from present to proven, every interlock and stop physically tested and signed on a written cycle, personal lock off is issued by name, and bridging becomes the site's one instant dismissal rule, paired with a promise kept: a faulting safety device stops the line until fixed, and nobody is timed on a jam again.

Key point

A guard that exists on paper and not in force is worse than none, because the file says safe: inspect to proven, not present, fix the device that keeps faulting instead of defeating it, and let the line stop.

Part 6 of 8

Signs a waste operation is trading protection for tempo

Interlocks or trip wires bridged, tied back or faulting and awaiting parts for weeks
Blockages cleared in under two minutes on machines whose isolation procedure takes five
PUWER inspection records that tick guards present without proving stops and interlocks work
A grab crane cycling continuously on a plain 12 month calendar with no examination scheme considered
Attachments swapped between machines with no report travelling with them
Exceptional events, pit fires, shock loads, grab strikes, followed by no re examination
Receivers in the compressor house with no certified Written Scheme
Picking cabin extraction excluded from any 14 month testing cycle
A statutory register that has not been physically walked against the yard in months
Key point

Every flag is tempo beating protection somewhere specific: the audit that clears them is physical, proven and walked, because on a waste site paper drifts from steel in weeks.

Part 7 of 8

The waste site calendar: scheduled stops on a site that never wants to

The waste calendar's defining feature is that the plant runs continuously and the examinations cannot, so the stops are designed in first. Plot the 12 month tier, or the scheme intervals where duty justified them, for the grab cranes, hook lifts and handlers; the 6 month accessory sweep for grabs, chains, slings and the MEWP; the written PUWER proving cycle for interlocks, stops and isolation across the line; the scheme intervals and 28 day report windows on the air plant; and the 14 month LEV cycle over the picking cabins, diaried from the last test's date.

The waste yearJFMAMJJASONDKit and MEWPx2 a yrGrabs, hooksx1 a yrLEV testdriftsProving cyclealways
The waste year designed around the stops: examination windows matched to low intake periods, the accessory sweep in one visit, and the proving cycle running continuously between them.

Then match the calendar to the site's real rhythm. Intake has patterns, seasonal, contractual, weekly, and examinations belong in the troughs, booked with the examiner months ahead because the trough is short. Split the mobile fleet so the line never loses grab capacity entirely. Pair the accessory sweep with the workshop's quiet Friday. And put the exceptional circumstances triggers on the same page as the planned dates, with names against them, so the pit fire's aftermath includes the re examination as automatically as the insurance call.

The standing audit is the sector's version of the two column check: serviced, examined and proven as three separate facts per asset, reconciled monthly on foot.

Key point

Design the stops into the intake troughs and book them months out, sweep the accessories in one visit, and keep serviced, examined and proven as three columns walked monthly: continuous plant complies by planning, never by pausing when convenient.

Part 8 of 8

Running the programme: one body for a site that cannot stop twice

For a waste operator the efficient arrangement is one independent inspection body across the lifting estate, the pressure plant and the LEV, with the PUWER proving regime supported on the same visit rhythm: one calendar built around the site's intake troughs, one report format, one file. Consolidation matters doubly here because every examination visit costs line time, and a body that examines the grab crane, the accessories, the receivers and the picking cabin extraction in one planned stop halves the number of stops the tempo has to absorb.

Independence has a sharp edge on a waste site: the examiner who sells no repairs will fail the grab that deserves it the week before it drops a load, and will tier the interlock finding without softening it for the relationship, which is exactly the opinion a site under production pressure needs in writing. It is also the report that reads cleanly to the audiences this sector answers to, HSE, the environmental regulator's parallel interest in site management, insurers who price this sector's risk hard, and the local authority contracts that increasingly audit compliance evidence.

Close the loop at waste tempo: reports read the day they land, dated defects into the maintenance system that day, failed controls stopping the machine they protect until fixed and retested, and trends on the hardest worked plant reviewed quarterly. A waste site run that way turns its most dangerous characteristic, relentless duty, into its compliance argument: everything is examined, proven and evidenced precisely because everything runs so hard.

Key point

One independent body, stops planned into intake troughs, findings actioned at line speed and controls proven rather than assumed: waste compliance run as hard as the plant it protects.

Related services
Common questions

Waste & Recycling inspection FAQs

What kind of waste operations do you cover?

Materials recovery facilities, transfer stations, scrap and metal recyclers, skip hire operations, composting sites and energy from waste support plant, nationwide.

How quickly can you attend?

Usually within a few working days, worked around tipping and processing windows, with night visits routine on continuous sites. Call 0330 043 8191 with the site list.

How often does the grab crane need examining?

At least every 12 months as lifting equipment, with the grab itself and any chains every 6 months as accessories. The full interval framework is in our LOLER guide.

Are our balers and compactors covered by LOLER?

No, they process rather than lift, so they sit under PUWER: risk-based inspection intervals with a written record, and with guarding, interlocks and isolation at the centre of what is checked. HSE's machinery guidance for the sector is at hse.gov.uk.

Does a 360 excavator need a thorough examination?

When it is used for lifting, handling suspended loads or object handling with a grab, yes. Machines used purely for excavation sit under PUWER, and many yard machines genuinely do both, so we set the position per machine with you.

What happens after a machine is repaired or fire damaged?

It is examined before it returns to service, whatever the calendar says. Deterioration and repair are exactly the exceptional circumstances the regulations name.

Do skip lorries need anything beyond the MOT?

Yes. The hook lift or skip loader gear is lorry mounted lifting equipment on a 12 month thorough examination cycle, entirely separate from the vehicle's roadworthiness testing.

Can you inspect the picking line without stopping it for a day?

Usually. Conveyors and picking stations are inspected in sections around shift patterns, and the LEV serving the stations is tested in the same visit on its 14 month cycle.

Book statutory inspections for your Waste & Recycling operation