The honest answer to what an inspection costs: a quote built from your asset list. What drives the price in each regime, and the four things an accurate quote needs.
Partner with an independent inspection body to cover your clients’ statutory obligations. One point of contact across all four regimes, with verified written reports and nationwide, multi-site cover for every plant type.
Independent advice on compliance, written schemes of examination and inspection strategy, from competent engineer surveyors with no equipment to sell you.
LOLER, PUWER, PSSR and COSHH LEV compliance from one independent inspection body.
A warehouse runs on examined equipment: the truck fleet on its thorough examination cycle, the racking on its annual expert inspection, the dock levellers and conveyors on risk-based PUWER intervals. Miss one date and the aisle stops.
SEIS examines the whole materials handling estate in one programme, from a single counterbalance truck to a multi-site fleet, with due dates tracked in the client portal.
Standard thorough examination cycle for load-only trucks
6-monthly
Cycle for accessories and people-lifting MHE
Annual
Expert racking inspection HSG76 expects
After impact
Struck racking is inspected before reloading
Warehouse cover
3PLs, distribution centres and cold stores
Truck fleets, racking and dock equipment together
Examinations scheduled around shift patterns
Multi-site programmes with one report portal
What needs inspecting
What needs inspecting in a warehouse
Two regimes carry most of the load. LOLER puts every truck, MEWP and goods lift on a fixed thorough examination cycle. PUWER covers the racking, dock levellers and conveyors, where the interval is risk-based rather than a fixed statutory date, and where HSE guidance HSG76 sets the expectation of an expert racking inspection at least every 12 months.
Equipment
Regime
Statutory position
What you receive
Counterbalance and reach trucks
LOLER
Thorough examination at least every 12 months for load-only trucks
Report of Thorough Examination
Fork attachments and lifting accessories
LOLER
Every 6 months, examined separately from the truck
Report of Thorough Examination
MEWPs and order pickers
LOLER
Every 6 months because they lift people
Report of Thorough Examination
Telehandlers
LOLER
6 or 12 months as the competent person determines from use
Report of Thorough Examination
Goods lifts
LOLER
Thorough examination at least every 12 months
Report of Thorough Examination
Pallet racking
PUWER
Expert inspection at least annually per HSG76, plus inspection before reloading after any impact
Written record of inspection
Dock levellers and shelters
PUWER
Inspection at risk-based intervals, no fixed statutory date
Written record of inspection
Conveyor and sortation systems
PUWER
Risk-based intervals set from your risk assessment
Written record of inspection
Air receivers on wrapping and packing lines
PSSR
Examination to the Written Scheme, report within 28 days
Written Scheme certification and examination report
Racking has no fixed statutory examination date and no statutory certificate. The annual expert inspection is HSG76 guidance meeting the PUWER duty, and it produces a written record of inspection.
Sector compliance
Fixed cycles, risk-based intervals, and the gap between
The warehouses that fail audits rarely miss the big dates. They miss the boundaries: the fork attachment examined on the truck's 12-month cycle when it needed 6, or the racking upright struck in March and reloaded before anyone competent looked at it.
The truck is not the whole examination
A thorough examination that covers only the lifting components leaves the duty holder exposed under PUWER, because Regulation 6 requires inspection of the whole truck where deterioration creates danger. A complete examination covers both regimes in one report.
Attachments are the second gap. A removable attachment is a lifting accessory on the 6-month cycle even when the truck itself runs 12 months, so a fleet examined once a year can still be half out of date.
Racking is the third: any upright struck by a truck must be inspected before the bay is reloaded, whatever the date of the last annual inspection.
How SEIS runs a warehouse programme
One programme covers trucks, attachments, MEWPs, goods lifts, racking, dock equipment and any receivers on the packing lines, examined around shift patterns so aisles keep moving. Night and weekend visits are routine in distribution.
Reports arrive through the client portal with defect gradings and due dates tracked across sites, which is what a multi-site QSHE manager actually needs: one calendar, one evidence trail, no spreadsheet reconciliation before an audit.
The warehouse estate: trucks, racking, docks and the duties each carries
A warehouse looks like one estate and complies as three. The truck fleet, fork lifts, reach trucks, order pickers and their attachments, answers to LOLER on the examination tiers. The racking that holds the stock answers to PUWER as work equipment, with inspection where deterioration leads to danger, which in racking is always. And the dock estate, levellers, scissor lifts and the yard's tail lifts, splits between the two regimes by what each item does. Map those three correctly and warehouse compliance is straightforward; muddle them and the gaps hide in plain sight for years.
Three estates under one roof: the truck fleet on LOLER tiers, the racking under PUWER inspection, and the dock equipment split between regimes by function.
The sector's defining hazard concentration is traffic and structure: trucks working dense aisles against loaded racking, day and night, with impacts inevitable and their consequences cumulative. That is why the two disciplines this guide keeps returning to are the accessory tier on the fleet, where the fork lift paperwork most often fails, and damage reporting on the racking, where the structure's condition is only as current as the last honest walk down the aisles.
One scoping note that saves confusion: simple pallet trucks that raise a load only clear of the floor sit outside LOLER entirely, as do conveyors; both remain squarely under PUWER for maintenance and inspection. The regime follows the function.
Key point
Trucks on LOLER, racking under PUWER, docks split by function, and pallet trucks and conveyors outside LOLER but inside PUWER: map the three estates once and the whole warehouse has a clock.
Part 2 of 8
The truck fleet: 12 month machines, 6 month forks, and the man up exception
The fleet runs on LOLER's tiers with two details that catch warehouses more than any other sector. First, fork arms are lifting accessories in their own right, on the 6 month tier, regardless of the truck's 12 month examination; HSE flags this as one of the most frequent compliance gaps in workplace inspection programmes, and a fleet of trucks with current annual reports and no fork arm examinations is a fleet out of compliance. The same accessory logic covers every attachment in the cage: rotators, clamps, extension forks and lifting attachments each carry their own report.
Second, the man up exception: order pickers and any truck that raises the operator with the load are people lifting equipment, which moves the whole machine onto the 6 month tier. A mixed fleet therefore runs mixed intervals by design, and the register must say per truck which tier it sits on and why.
Each examination produces a Report of Thorough Examination to Schedule 1, and the sector's hire heavy fleets should note that duties on hired trucks are shared and concurrent: the report arrives with the truck, and keeping it current through a long hire is the user's problem as much as the hire company's. Reports are retained until the next report or two years, whichever is later, and the retrieval test that matters is an aisle side one: serial number to current report in under a minute.
Key point
Trucks on 12 months, every fork arm and attachment on 6, and man up machines on 6 entirely: the fleet register must carry the tier per asset, because mixed intervals are the sector's design, not its accident.
Part 3 of 8
Racking: the structure that only stays safe if damage gets reported
Racking is work equipment under PUWER, and its duties read directly onto steel: maintained in an efficient state and good repair under Regulation 5, inspected under Regulation 6 because deterioration here visibly leads to danger, with the inspection producing a written record. In practice the sector runs racking protection on three layers. Daily, operators report impacts and visible damage the moment they happen, into a system that cannot be ignored. Regularly, a trained person walks the installation to a written schedule, logging damage against the manufacturer's tolerances. And periodically, an independent expert inspection assesses the whole installation, classifies damage by severity, and directs offloading and repair, with industry guidance expecting that expert layer at regular intervals and immediately after significant incidents.
Two racking truths decide outcomes. Damage is cumulative and load bearing capacity is unforgiving: a bent upright carries less than its tables say, and the collapse mode is progressive, taking neighbouring bays with it. And configuration is part of the structure: beam heights, load notices and the loads actually stored must agree, because racking altered without recalculation is the quiet cousin of racking hit by a truck.
The estate level control is the damage log married to the inspection record: every impact reported, every report classified, every serious classification offloaded first and repaired second, and the load notices audited whenever configuration changes.
Key point
Racking survives on reported damage: run the three layers, operator reports, scheduled walks and independent expert inspection, offload before repair on anything serious, and keep configuration and load notices honest.
Worked example
Worked example: the aisle end upright and the culture that hid it
A regional distribution centre, nine metre racking, two shifts, prides itself on flow. An aisle end upright takes a glancing reach truck strike on nights; the driver, three weeks into the job and pressured by pick rates, says nothing. The dent sits at knee height behind the column guard's shadow, and the weekly walk, done fast by a supervisor with a checklist habit, misses it twice.
One unreported strike, two hurried walks, and a bay carrying full pallets on an upright with a fraction of its rated capacity: racking failures are culture failures first.
The independent expert inspection five weeks later finds it in ninety seconds, classifies it at the serious end, and directs the bay offloaded immediately. Unloading reveals the upright deformed beyond repair and the bracing strained; the repair replaces the upright and the adjacent beams. Engineering wise, the system worked: the expert layer caught what the daily and weekly layers missed. Culturally, the finding is worse: drivers interviewed afterwards admit strikes go unreported as routine, because reporting means an interview and pick rates mean everything.
The rebuild is cultural before it is procedural: impact reporting made blame free and thirty seconds fast, near miss numbers published, column guards extended, and the weekly walk given to a trained checker with time to look. The next quarter logs eleven impact reports, none serious, all inspected. Eleven reports is not a worse warehouse than zero; it is the same warehouse telling the truth.
Key point
The expert inspection is the safety net, not the system: racking compliance is won at the moment of impact, and a warehouse whose drivers report strikes freely is safer than one whose log is clean.
Part 5 of 8
Signs a warehouse estate is quietly out of tolerance
Truck fleet on current annual reports with no separate 6 month fork arm or attachment examinations
Order pickers examined on 12 month cycles as if the operator did not go up with the load
A racking damage log that shows zero entries per quarter in a live aisle operation
Column guards scarred white while the log behind them stays clean
Weekly racking walks done by whoever is free, fast, with a ticked sheet and no measurements
Load notices that no longer match beam heights after the last reconfiguration
Long hire trucks whose examinations lapsed mid hire because both parties assumed the other was scheduling
Slings and spare attachments in the charge area that appear on no register
Dock levellers and tail lifts maintained on contract with nobody able to name their statutory position
Key point
A clean damage log over a scarred guard rail is the sector's most reliable warning sign: silence in a warehouse is not compliance, it is unreported contact.
Part 6 of 8
The warehouse compliance calendar: mixed tiers on one page
The warehouse calendar carries more mixed intervals than any comparable estate, which is exactly why it must live on one page. The 6 month tier: fork arms, every attachment, and every man up machine. The 12 month tier: the rest of the truck fleet, unless an examination scheme says otherwise. The racking rhythm: daily reporting always on, the scheduled walks weekly or to your written frequency, and the independent expert inspection at its regular interval and after any significant incident. The dock and yard estate: tail lifts and scissor lifts on their LOLER tiers, levellers and conveyors on written PUWER cycles.
One page, four rhythms: the 6 and 12 month LOLER tiers, the racking's daily to expert cadence, and the PUWER cycles on docks and conveyors, plotted forward together.
Plot it twelve months forward and use the sector's one scheduling gift: warehouses know their quiet windows precisely. Land the fleet examinations outside peak, split them so half the fleet is never off line together, and pair the expert racking inspection with a configuration audit so load notices are trued in the same visit. Then run the two column audit quarterly, every asset showing last serviced and last examined separately, because the fleet's service contract is the place examination gaps hide in this sector.
Key point
Mixed tiers are the warehouse's normal: one forward page, examinations landed in known quiet windows, half the fleet always running, and the racking expert visit paired with a load notice audit.
Part 7 of 8
Docks, tail lifts and MEWPs: the edge of the building estate
The building's edge runs its own mixed estate and it is worth mapping precisely, because function decides regime item by item. Dock levellers bridge rather than lift, so they sit under PUWER, maintained and inspected with written records on the cycle you set. Scissor lifts and goods platforms that raise loads between levels are lifting equipment on the LOLER 12 month tier. Vehicle mounted tail lifts are lifting equipment too, 12 months for goods only use, and 6 the moment a configuration lifts a person with the load. And the MEWPs used for racking repairs, lighting and sprinkler work lift people by design, so machine and basket sit on the 6 month tier entire.
The dock estate's compliance risk is contractual rather than technical: levellers and doors commonly live inside a facilities maintenance contract, tail lifts inside the fleet contract, and MEWPs inside a hire arrangement, three different suppliers each assuming statutory examination is someone else's line item. The audit that closes it is the same two column check the fleet gets, per asset, maintained by whom, examined by whom, with neither column blank and neither supplier assumed.
One more edge item earns a line: the yard shunter's fifth wheel and any loading ramps join the PUWER records, because the estate ends at the boundary fence, not the dock door.
Key point
Levellers under PUWER, platforms and tail lifts on 12 months, anything carrying people on 6: map the building's edge by function, and audit which contract actually examines each item, because three suppliers each assuming the other is how docks go unexamined.
Part 8 of 8
Running the programme: one body across fleet, racking and docks
The efficient arrangement for a warehouse operator is one independent inspection body across the whole estate: the fleet and its accessory tier examined to LOLER, the racking's expert inspection layer, and the dock and pressure odds and ends, on one calendar with one report format feeding one register. Consolidation matters here more than in most sectors because the assets are numerous and cheap individually; forty attachments examined ad hoc cost more and comply worse than forty on one schedule.
Independence carries a specific warehouse value: the racking expert who sells no repairs and the truck examiner who sells no trucks give findings with nothing behind them, which is the opinion you want directing an offload decision at 2pm on a Friday peak. It is also the report that reads cleanly to the insurer, the landlord and the retail customer audit, three audiences this sector answers to constantly.
Then work the outputs: defect dates diarised and closed, racking classifications actioned in order, observations trended on the ageing half of the fleet, and the register reconciled to the floor monthly because warehouse assets move like warehouse stock. Run that loop and the estate's compliance becomes as measurable as its pick rates, which is precisely how a logistics business should want it.
Key point
One independent body, one schedule across trucks, racking and docks, findings actioned in classification order and the register walked monthly: warehouse compliance run with the same discipline as the operation it protects.
Yes. We run examination programmes for 3PLs, retailers' distribution centres, cold stores and manufacturers' finished goods warehouses, single site or national estate.
How quickly can you attend?
Usually within a few working days, and sooner where a truck or MEWP is out of service awaiting examination. Call 0330 043 8191 and we will work around your shift pattern, including nights.
How often does a forklift need a thorough examination?
At least every 12 months for a truck lifting loads only, and every 6 months for any removable attachment or accessory, or where the truck lifts people in a work platform. The full intervals are in our LOLER regulations guide.
Is an annual racking inspection a legal requirement?
The precise duty is PUWER: racking is work equipment that must be maintained and inspected where deterioration creates danger. HSE guidance HSG76 sets the expectation of an expert inspection at least every 12 months, and following it is the accepted way to meet the duty. There is no fixed statutory date and no statutory certificate.
What happens when a truck hits the racking?
The struck section is inspected by a competent person before it is reloaded, regardless of when the last annual inspection took place. Isolate the bay, offload it, and record the damage against the SEMA red, amber and green classifications.
Does the thorough examination cover PUWER too?
Ours do. An examination confined to the lifting components can leave the rest of the truck unexamined under PUWER Regulation 6, so we cover both regimes in a single report, in line with HSE guidance at hse.gov.uk.
Can you align a mixed fleet onto one calendar?
Yes. We set each item's statutory interval, then schedule visits so trucks, attachments, MEWPs and racking fall into a single programme with the fewest site visits that compliance allows.
What records should we hold for an audit?
The current Report of Thorough Examination for every truck, MEWP, goods lift and accessory, the written records of racking and dock equipment inspections, and evidence that defects were actioned. Our portal holds all of it against each asset.
Book statutory inspections for your Warehousing & Logistics operation
The honest answer to what an inspection costs: a quote built from your asset list. What drives the price in each regime, and the four things an accurate quote needs.
Partner with an independent inspection body to cover your clients’ statutory obligations. One point of contact across all four regimes, with verified written reports and nationwide, multi-site cover for every plant type.
Independent advice on compliance, written schemes of examination and inspection strategy, from competent engineer surveyors with no equipment to sell you.