Book A Thorough Examination
Need your lifting, work, pressure or LEV equipment examined in line with their relevant regulations? Get a quote today to ensure you remain compliant.
PUWER vs LOLER: What’s the Difference, and When Do They Apply?
If you manage equipment, machinery, or lifting operations in the workplace, chances are you’ve come across PUWER and LOLER. These two sets of UK regulations are often mentioned together — and frequently confused.
While they overlap in places, PUWER and LOLER have very different purposes, apply in different situations, and impose different legal duties on employers and duty holders.
This guide explains:
-
The key differences between them
-
When each regulation applies
-
What inspections and examinations are required
-
Common compliance mistakes (and how to avoid them)
What Is PUWER?
PUWER stands for the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998.
PUWER applies to almost all work equipment used by employees at work, regardless of whether it lifts loads or not.
What Counts as “Work Equipment” Under PUWER?
PUWER defines work equipment very broadly, including:
-
Vehicles used at work (e.g. forklifts, site dumpers)
-
Office equipment (where relevant)
If equipment is used, operated, or controlled by employees, PUWER almost certainly applies.
Core PUWER Requirements
Under PUWER, employers must ensure that work equipment is:
-
Suitable for its intended use
-
Safe and properly maintained
-
Inspected where risks exist
-
Used only by trained and competent people
-
Fitted with appropriate guards and safety controls
PUWER focuses on how equipment is used, not just its design.
What Is LOLER?
LOLER stands for the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998.
LOLER applies specifically to:
-
Lifting equipment
-
Lifting operations involving loads or people
In short, if equipment is used to lift or lower a load, LOLER is likely to apply.
What Counts as Lifting Equipment?
Examples include:
LOLER is concerned with the risks created by lifting, particularly the risk of falling loads.
PUWER vs LOLER: The Key Differences
Although both regulations were introduced in 1998, they serve different but complementary roles.
1. Scope
| PUWER | LOLER |
|---|---|
| Applies to all work equipment | Applies only to lifting equipment |
| Covers use, maintenance, and training | Covers lifting operations and load safety |
2. Focus
3. Inspection vs Thorough Examination
This is one of the most misunderstood differences.
-
PUWER inspections
-
Risk-based
-
Usually visual or functional checks
-
Can be carried out by a competent person within the organisation
-
-
LOLER thorough examinations
-
Formal, detailed examinations
-
Must be carried out by a competent person independent enough to make objective judgments
-
Legally required at set intervals
-
When Do PUWER and LOLER Apply Together?
In many cases, both regulations apply at the same time.
Example: Forklift Truck
A forklift truck is:
-
Work equipment → PUWER applies
-
Lifting equipment → LOLER applies
This means:
-
PUWER governs training, daily checks, maintenance, and safe operation
-
LOLER governs the lifting mechanism, load handling, and thorough examinations
Compliance with one regulation does not remove the need to comply with the other.
LOLER Thorough Examination Intervals
LOLER sets specific maximum intervals for thorough examinations:
-
6 months
-
Lifting equipment used to lift people
-
Lifting accessories (e.g. slings, chains)
-
-
12 months
-
Lifting equipment used to lift goods only
-
-
After exceptional circumstances
-
E.g. overload, damage, modification, or accident
-
A written LOLER report must be produced and retained.
Common PUWER and LOLER Compliance Mistakes
Assuming PUWER Inspections Replace LOLER Examinations
They don’t. A PUWER inspection cannot legally replace a LOLER thorough examination.
Forgetting Accessories
Lifting accessories often get overlooked, yet they usually require 6-monthly LOLER examinations.
Poor Record Keeping
Both regulations require documented evidence of inspections, examinations, and maintenance.
Lack of Training
PUWER explicitly requires that users are adequately trained, not just “experienced”.
Who Is Responsible for Compliance?
Responsibility usually sits with:
-
Employers
-
Equipment owners
-
Duty holders
-
Those in control of lifting operations
In shared workplaces, responsibility must be clearly defined to avoid gaps in compliance.
Why PUWER and LOLER Matter
Failure to comply can result in:
-
Enforcement notices
-
Prosecution
-
Significant fines
-
Increased accident risk
-
Invalidated insurance cover
More importantly, proper compliance prevents serious injuries and fatalities, particularly from falling loads or unsafe machinery use.
PUWER vs LOLER: Quick Summary
-
PUWER applies to all work equipment and focuses on safe use
-
LOLER applies specifically to lifting equipment and lifting operations
-
Many pieces of equipment fall under both regulations
-
PUWER inspections and LOLER thorough examinations are not the same thing
-
Clear understanding is essential for legal compliance and workplace safety
Final Thoughts
PUWER and LOLER aren’t competing regulations — they work together to control different risks. Understanding where one ends and the other begins is essential for anyone responsible for workplace equipment.
If you’re unsure which regulations apply to your equipment, seeking advice from a competent inspection or examination provider can save time, money, and risk in the long run.
Statutory Inspections FAQ's
Yes — maintenance is required under LOLER, PUWER, PSSR, and COSHH, but it serves a different legal purpose to statutory inspection and examination. Each set of regulations includes a clear duty to maintain equipment or systems in a safe condition, alongside separate duties for inspection, testing, or examination.
Below is a clear, regulation-by-regulation explanation.
Maintenance Under LOLER (Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998)
Yes, maintenance is required.
LOLER requires lifting equipment to be maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order, and in good repair.
However, LOLER also makes it clear that:
-
Maintenance does not replace a thorough examination
-
Servicing alone does not demonstrate legal compliance
Maintenance helps prevent deterioration between examinations, but only a thorough examination by a competent person provides the legal assurance that lifting equipment is safe.
Maintenance Under PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998)
Yes, maintenance is a core requirement.
PUWER explicitly requires that work equipment is:
-
Maintained so it remains safe
-
Inspected where deterioration could result in danger
Maintenance under PUWER includes:
-
Planned preventative maintenance
-
Repairs
-
Adjustments
-
Replacement of worn components
However, PUWER maintenance must be supported by:
-
Suitable inspections
-
Risk assessments
-
Training and safe systems of work
Well-maintained equipment can still be non-compliant if guarding, controls, or usage are unsafe.
Maintenance Under PSSR (Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000)
Yes, maintenance is required — but with strict limits.
PSSR requires pressure systems to be:
-
Properly maintained to prevent danger
Crucially:
-
Maintenance must not interfere with the Written Scheme of Examination (WSE)
-
Maintenance cannot replace statutory examinations carried out to the WSE
Maintenance engineers may service pressure systems, but only a competent person appointed under PSSR can:
-
Define the WSE
-
Carry out statutory examinations
-
Decide whether a system is safe to remain in service
Maintenance Under COSHH (Including LEV Systems)
Yes, maintenance is required under COSHH.
COSHH requires control measures — including LEV systems — to be:
-
Properly maintained
-
Kept in efficient working order
-
Cleaned and serviced as necessary
However, COSHH also requires:
-
Thorough examination and test of LEV systems at least every 14 months
Changing filters, cleaning ductwork, or repairing fans:
➡️ does not demonstrate exposure control
Only a formal LEV examination and test confirms the system is effectively controlling hazardous substances.
Key Legal Principle Across All Regulations
Maintenance:
-
Prevents deterioration
-
Supports safe operation
-
Reduces breakdowns
Statutory inspection and examination:
-
Provides independent safety assurance
-
Demonstrates legal compliance
-
Protects duty holders legally and financially
Both are required — one cannot replace the other.
Summary Table
| Regulation | Is Maintenance Required? | Does Maintenance Replace Inspection? |
|---|---|---|
| LOLER | Yes | ❌ No |
| PUWER | Yes | ❌ No |
| PSSR | Yes | ❌ No |
| COSHH (LEV) | Yes | ❌ No |
Final Thought
If your organisation is maintaining equipment but not carrying out the required statutory inspections or examinations, it is not legally compliant — regardless of how good the maintenance regime is.
Maintenance keeps things working.
Statutory inspection proves they are safe.
A thorough examination can only be carried out by a competent, knowledgeable, experienced, and independent person with authority to make safety-critical decisions.
It is not enough that someone:
-
Services the equipment
-
Installed the equipment
-
Uses the equipment daily
Competence is about safety judgement, not familiarity.
No, at SEIS, we only carry out thorough examinations. This ensure we remain completely independent and impartial during out Thorough Examinations, as the regulations state. If we place a defect, it is because it is required, and not as a money generation too.
Yes, our Engineer Surveyors have a wealth of knowledge, experience and qualifications, and we are completely impartial, meaning we are able to carry out your LOLER98, PUWER98, PSSR2000 and COSHH2002 (LEV) thorough examinations.

