Book Your Statutory Inspection
Need your equipment examined in line with LOLER98, PUWER98, PSSR2000 & COSHH2002 regulations? Get a quote today to ensure you remain compliant.
How Statutory Inspections Protect Directors Personally
When you become a company director, your responsibilities extend far beyond strategy and profit. Under UK health and safety law, directors can be held personally accountable for failures in compliance. One of the most effective ways to protect both your business and yourself is through robust statutory inspections.
In this guide, we explain how LOLER, PUWER, PSSR, and LEV examinations under COSHH directly protect directors from prosecution, disqualification, and reputational damage — and why proactive compliance is a board-level responsibility.
Why Directors Can Be Personally Liable
Under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HSWA), directors and senior managers can face:
-
Personal prosecution
-
Unlimited fines
-
Disqualification from acting as a director
-
In severe cases, imprisonment
Section 37 of HSWA makes it clear: if a health and safety offence occurs with the consent, connivance, or neglect of a director, that individual can be prosecuted alongside the company.
The question is not just “Is the business compliant?”
It is “Can you demonstrate due diligence as a director?”
This is where statutory inspections play a critical role.
The Four Key Statutory Inspection Regimes
1. Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER)
LOLER applies to lifting equipment such as:
-
Cranes
-
Forklift trucks
-
Passenger and goods lifts
-
Hoists and lifting accessories
Director Risk Exposure:
If lifting equipment fails and causes injury or fatality, investigations will examine:
-
Was the equipment thoroughly examined by a competent person?
-
Were reports reviewed at board level?
-
Were defects acted upon promptly?
Failure to ensure regular thorough examinations can lead to prosecution under both LOLER and HSWA.
How LOLER Protects You Personally:
-
Provides documented evidence of proactive oversight
-
Demonstrates systems for defect management
-
Shows board-level governance of lifting safety
2. Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER)
PUWER covers virtually all work equipment, including:
-
Machinery
-
Power tools
-
Production equipment
-
Company vehicles
Director Risk Exposure:
Machinery-related injuries frequently result in enforcement action. Investigators will examine:
-
Maintenance records
-
Inspection schedules
-
Risk assessments
-
Training records
If inspection regimes are inadequate, directors may be accused of neglect.
How PUWER Compliance Protects Directors:
-
Creates defensible maintenance and inspection systems
-
Demonstrates active risk management
-
Reduces likelihood of improvement or prohibition notices
3. Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR)
PSSR applies to pressure systems such as:
-
Air compressors
-
Steam systems
-
Pressure vessels
-
Associated pipework
Director Risk Exposure:
Pressure system failures can result in catastrophic explosions. The HSE will immediately examine:
-
Whether a Written Scheme of Examination exists
-
Whether examinations were completed on time
-
Whether remedial actions were tracked
Lack of a compliant Written Scheme is one of the fastest routes to prosecution.
How PSSR Protects Directors:
-
Ensures formal engineering oversight
-
Provides clear compliance documentation
-
Demonstrates structured control of high-risk assets
4. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) – LEV Examinations
Under COSHH, Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV) systems must be thoroughly examined and tested at least every 14 months (or more frequently depending on risk).
LEV applies where airborne contaminants are controlled, including:
-
Welding fumes
-
Wood dust
-
Silica dust
-
Chemical vapours
Director Risk Exposure:
Recent enforcement trends show increasing focus on occupational lung disease. Failures in LEV testing can lead to:
-
Enforcement notices
-
Civil claims
-
Criminal prosecution
How LEV Examinations Protect You:
-
Demonstrate proactive control of long-latency health risks
-
Provide evidence against negligence claims
-
Show alignment with HSE focus areas
The Real Protection: Demonstrable Due Diligence
Statutory inspections are not just a compliance exercise — they form part of your legal defence strategy.
If an incident occurs, investigators will ask:
-
Were inspections completed on time?
-
Were competent persons used?
-
Were reports reviewed and signed off?
-
Were defects remedied promptly?
-
Was there board-level oversight?
If you can answer “yes” with documentation, your personal risk reduces significantly.
If you cannot — exposure increases.
What “Good” Looks Like at Director Level
To genuinely protect yourself, you should ensure:
1. A Centralised Compliance Register
All LOLER, PUWER, PSSR, and LEV assets logged and tracked.
2. Board-Level Reporting
Statutory inspection status included in monthly or quarterly board reports.
3. Competent Inspection Providers
Independent, technically qualified examiners.
4. Clear Defect Escalation Processes
Formal system for:
-
Categorising defects
-
Assigning responsibility
-
Tracking close-out
5. Written Governance Evidence
Board minutes showing review of statutory compliance.
The Cost of Non-Compliance
Recent prosecutions have resulted in:
-
Six-figure fines
-
Director disqualifications
-
Custodial sentences in severe cases
-
Long-term reputational damage
Beyond legal penalties, there is personal impact:
-
Stress
-
Media exposure
-
Career limitation
-
Loss of professional standing
Statutory inspections are modest in cost compared to these consequences.
Why This Matters More Than Ever
Regulatory focus is increasing in high-risk sectors such as:
-
Manufacturing
-
Construction
-
Engineering
-
Facilities management
-
Waste and recycling
The HSE has publicly prioritised:
-
Occupational lung disease
-
Machinery safety
-
Maintenance failures
-
Director accountability
Compliance is no longer delegated entirely to operational teams. It is now a governance issue.
Final Thoughts: Compliance as Personal Protection
LOLER, PUWER, PSSR, and LEV examinations are not just engineering requirements. They are legal safeguards for directors.
When properly managed, statutory inspections:
-
Reduce incident likelihood
-
Provide documentary defence
-
Demonstrate due diligence
-
Protect your personal liberty and career
As a director, the question is not whether your company has inspections in place.
The question is whether you can prove that you exercised reasonable care, oversight, and leadership.
Statutory inspections — when structured correctly — provide that proof.
If you would like guidance on structuring statutory inspection governance at board level, consider speaking with a competent health and safety professional.
Statutory Inspections FAQ's
Yes. Under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, directors can be prosecuted personally if an offence is committed with their consent, connivance, or neglect. Failure to ensure compliance with statutory inspections under Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (LOLER), Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER), Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR), or Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) can form the basis of enforcement action.
Statutory inspections create documented evidence of due diligence. If an incident occurs, directors must demonstrate that systems were in place to identify defects, manage risk, and act on inspection findings. Up-to-date reports, competent examiners, and clear defect close-out records provide a defensible position in any investigation.
LOLER applies to lifting equipment and accessories, including cranes, forklift trucks, hoists, passenger lifts, and lifting slings. Thorough examinations must be carried out by a competent person at legally defined intervals, typically every 6 or 12 months depending on use.
PUWER applies broadly to all work equipment, ensuring it is safe for use, maintained properly, and inspected where necessary. LOLER specifically covers lifting operations and lifting equipment. Many assets, such as forklift trucks, fall under both regulations, meaning compliance with both is required.
Under PSSR, certain pressure systems must have a Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) prepared by a competent person. This document defines what parts of the system must be examined, how often, and by what method. Failure to have a compliant WSE is a common enforcement issue and can significantly increase director liability.
Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV) systems must be thoroughly examined and tested at least every 14 months, unless a more frequent interval is specified based on risk. LEV testing ensures harmful airborne substances such as welding fumes, wood dust, and silica are effectively controlled.
No. While directors can delegate operational tasks, they cannot delegate legal responsibility. Regulators will assess whether there was adequate board-level oversight, reporting, and governance of statutory inspection regimes. Active monitoring and review are essential to demonstrate due diligence..
Directors should ensure they have visibility of:
-
A central statutory inspection register
-
LOLER, PUWER, PSSR, and LEV examination reports
-
Defect categorisation and close-out tracking
-
Evidence of competent examiners
-
Board minutes referencing compliance oversight
This documentation can be critical in defending against allegations of neglect.
Penalties may include unlimited fines for companies, director disqualification, and in severe cases imprisonment. Enforcement notices, reputational damage, and civil claims often follow serious inspection failures.
Health and safety compliance is increasingly viewed as a corporate governance matter. Regulators expect directors to take proactive responsibility for high-risk areas such as lifting equipment, machinery safety, pressure systems, and occupational health controls. Proper statutory inspections demonstrate leadership, accountability, and responsible management.
If you are a company director or senior leader, ensuring robust compliance with LOLER, PUWER, PSSR, and COSHH is not just a legal obligation — it is a critical step in protecting your personal position and professional reputation.
