Written Scheme Of Examination
Need an Written Scheme of Examination drawing up in line with PSSR2000 regulations? Get a quote today to ensure you remain compliant.
Need an Written Scheme of Examination drawing up in line with PSSR2000 regulations? Get a quote today to ensure you remain compliant.
A Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) is a formal, documented plan that sets out how and when a pressure system will be examined to ensure it remains safe to operate. It is a legal requirement under the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR 2000) for certain pressure systems.
The purpose of a Written Scheme of Examination is to prevent danger arising from the failure of pressure equipment. It identifies the specific parts of a pressure system that need regular examination because their failure could pose a risk, such as pressure vessels, pipework, and protective devices like safety valves.
Under the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR 2000), a Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) is required before a pressure system is first used and while it remains in service, if the system falls within the scope of the regulations.
A Written Scheme of Examination is required when a pressure system contains a “relevant fluid” and operates above certain pressure x volume threshold. Relevant fluids include steam, compressed gases, and fluids that become gas under pressure (such as air).
Specifically, a WSE is required for:
Steam systems, regardless of pressure
Pressure systems containing gas or liquefied gas where the pressure is greater than 0.5 bar above atmospheric pressure and the system has the potential to store significant energy
Pressure vessels, pipework, and protective devices that could give rise to danger if they fail
The Written Scheme must be:
Drawn up or certified as suitable by a Competent Person
In place before the system is operated
Kept up to date throughout the life of the pressure system
The scheme must clearly identify:
Which parts of the system require examination
The nature and frequency of examinations
The measures needed to prepare the system for safe examination
Any special conditions or limits on operation
In summary, if a pressure system could pose a danger due to stored pressure energy, PSSR 2000 requires a Written Scheme of Examination to ensure it is examined regularly and safely. This applies widely across industries such as manufacturing, power generation, food processing, healthcare, and utilities.
Under the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR 2000), a Relevant Fluid is defined as a fluid that can present a danger due to the energy stored under pressure or its physical properties.
A fluid is classed as a relevant fluid if it falls into either of the following categories:
Steam
Steam is always a relevant fluid under PSSR 2000, regardless of pressure or temperature.
Any gas, or mixture of gases, which is at a pressure greater than 0.5 bar above atmospheric pressure
This includes compressed air, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and many industrial process gases.
This definition also includes:
Liquids that are kept under pressure and would release gas if pressure were reduced, such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), refrigerants, or ammonia.
Air systems, including compressed air receivers and pipework, when operating above 0.5 bar gauge.
Fluids not normally considered relevant fluids under PSSR include:
Liquids that are not heated above their boiling point and do not generate gas when pressure is released (for example, water in a cold-water system).
In summary, under PSSR 2000, a relevant fluid is steam, gas, or a pressurised fluid capable of releasing gas, where its pressure and stored energy could pose a risk if the system fails.
The pressure × volume by-product (P × V) is a value used in pressure-system safety to indicate the amount of stored energy within a pressure vessel or system. It is particularly relevant under the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR 2000) when assessing whether a system has the potential to cause danger.
The calculation is straightforward:
Pressure (bar) × Volume (litres)
Pressure is taken as the maximum allowable pressure above atmospheric pressure (bar gauge), and volume is the internal volume of the vessel or system in litres.
The P × V by-product helps determine:
Whether a pressure system is considered significant enough to present a risk
Whether the system falls within the scope of PSSR
If a Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) is required
As a general guide under PSSR:
For gas systems (excluding steam), a pressure system is normally considered relevant if the P × V exceeds 250 bar-litres
Steam systems are always within scope, regardless of P × V
For example:
A compressed air receiver rated at 10 bar with a volume of 50 litres has a P × V of 500 bar-litres, which exceeds the 250 bar-litre threshold and would therefore fall within PSSR.
In summary, the pressure × volume by-product is a simple method of estimating stored energy in a pressure system and is used to decide the level of regulatory control and inspection required to ensure safety.
Minor systems include those containing steam, pressurised hot water,
compressed air, inert gases or fluorocarbon refrigerants which are small
and present few engineering problems. The pressure (above
atmospheric pressure) should be less than 20 bar (2.0 MPa) (except for
systems with a direct-fired heat source when it should be less than 2 bar
(200 kPa). The pressure-volume product for the largest vessel should be
less than 2 x 105 bar litres (20 MPa m3). The temperatures in the system
should be between -20 °C and 250 °C except in the case of smaller
refrigeration systems operating at lower temperatures which will also fall
into this category. Pipelines are not included.
Intermediate systems include most storage systems and process
systems which do not fall into either of the other two categories.
Pipelines are included unless they fall into the major system category.
Major systems are those which because of their size, complexity or
hazardous contents require the highest level of expertise in determining
their condition. They include steam-generating systems where the
individual capacities of the steam-generators are more than 10 MW, any
pressure storage system where the pressure-volume product for the
largest pressure vessel is more than 106 bar litres (100 MPa m3) and any
manufacturing or chemical reaction system where the pressure-volume
product for the largest pressure vessel is more than 105 bar litres (10
MPa m3). Pipelines are included if the pressure-volume product is
greater than 105 bar litres.
Under the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR 2000), a Competent Person is an individual or organisation with the necessary knowledge, experience, and independence to carry out specific duties related to the safe management of pressure systems.
The role of the Competent Person is critical to ensuring that pressure systems are examined properly and do not present a danger.
A Competent Person is someone who:
Has sufficient technical knowledge of pressure systems, including design, operation, and failure modes
Has practical experience in examining pressure vessels, pipework, and safety devices
Is independent and impartial, meaning they must not be subject to commercial or operational pressures that could influence their judgement
This may be:
An individual engineer
An inspection body
An insurance inspection company
A specialist engineering organisation
Under PSSR 2000, a Competent Person is responsible for:
Drawing up or certifying Written Schemes of Examination (WSE)
Carrying out examinations in accordance with the WSE
Assessing whether a pressure system is safe to operate
Specifying examination intervals
Reporting defects that could give rise to danger
If a dangerous defect is found, the Competent Person must:
Issue a written report
Specify timescales for remedial action
Notify the enforcing authority if there is an immediate risk
A key requirement under PSSR is that the Competent Person must be sufficiently independent from the day-to-day operation and maintenance of the pressure system. For example:
The system owner or operator may not be considered competent if their role compromises impartiality
Maintenance contractors may act as a Competent Person only if independence can be demonstrated
A Competent Person under PSSR 2000 is a qualified, experienced, and independent expert who ensures pressure systems are examined safely, legally, and effectively, helping prevent failures, accidents, and legal non-compliance.
Under the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 (PSSR 2000), inspection periods stated in a Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) are decided by a Competent Person using a risk-based assessment, SAFed Guidance PSG 01 – Guidelines on Periodicity of Examinations, and are not fixed time limits.
Inspection intervals are set by considering the likelihood of failure and the potential consequences if failure occurs. The Competent Person assesses several key factors:
Steam systems usually require more frequent examinations due to high stored energy and risk
Gas and compressed air systems are assessed based on stored energy (P × V)
Liquefied gases often require shorter intervals due to rapid expansion risk
Higher pressures and temperatures increase stress on equipment
Systems operating close to design limits generally have shorter inspection intervals
Systems with higher stored energy are examined more frequently
Lower P × V systems may justify longer periods between examinations
Older systems or those with unknown history often require shorter intervals
Materials of construction and fabrication standards are considered
Weld quality and corrosion allowance affect inspection frequency
Good maintenance records and previous satisfactory examinations can justify longer intervals
History of defects, corrosion, or repairs usually leads to shorter intervals
Corrosive, wet, or aggressive environments increase deterioration risk
Systems subject to frequent pressure cycling or intermittent use may need more frequent inspections
Reliability of safety valves, pressure switches, and control systems is assessed
Protective devices often have separate inspection intervals from vessels or pipework
While not fixed in law, common industry practice includes:
Steam boilers: 12–14 months
Steam receivers: 24–48 months
Compressed air receivers: 24–60 months
Safety valves: 12 months
These are guidelines only and can be increased or reduced based on risk.
Inspection periods in a Written Scheme of Examination are:
Set by a Competent Person
Risk-based, not time-based
Influenced by pressure, fluid, stored energy, condition, and operating environment
Reviewed and updated following each examination
This approach ensures inspections are proportionate, effective, and focused on preventing danger, as intended by PSSR 2000.
A PSSR2000 Written Scheme of Examination is a legally required document in the UK for all pressure systems used at work (if the pre-set criteria is met), and an examination must be carried out in line with said written scheme of examination, and for good reason. These inspections ensure that pressure systems and their equipment, such as air receivers, pressure vessels, steam boilers, and other vessels containing a relevant fluid are safe to use, and fit for purpose. The nature of pressure systems and their associated vessels means that equipment failure can lead to catastrophic consequences, including serious injury, fatalities, and significant damage to property. By carrying out regular, scheduled thorough and in service examinations by a competent person, in line with a Written Scheme of Examination (WSE), businesses can identify failure mechanisms, structural damage, or faulty system protective devices before they result in an incident.
Legal Compliance and Risk Reduction: The most obvious advantage is staying compliant with health and safety law. Compliance avoids potential legal action, fines, or even prosecution. More importantly, it drastically reduces the risk of workplace accidents caused by lifting equipment failure.
Improved Safety Culture: Regular inspections foster a proactive safety culture within the organisation. Employees are more likely to trust equipment and feel safe in their work environment when they know thorough checks are in place.
Extended Equipment Lifespan: Regularly maintained and inspected equipment typically lasts longer. Examinations can identify early signs of damage or fatigue, allowing for preventative maintenance that avoids costly replacements or repairs.
Insurance and Liability Protection: Insurers may require evidence of PSSR compliance in the event of an incident. Without valid inspection records, insurance claims could be denied or reduced, leaving the business liable for damages.
Operational Efficiency: Detecting potential issues before they lead to equipment failure helps prevent unscheduled downtime. This keeps operations running smoothly and avoids the knock-on effects of delayed projects or interrupted workflows.
Legal and Financial Consequences: Failing to comply with PSSR can result in enforcement action from the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), including improvement notices, prohibition notices, fines, or even prosecution. Legal battles and associated costs can be financially crippling.
Increased Risk of Accidents: Equipment that hasn’t been thoroughly examined is far more likely to fail. Such failures can lead to injuries or fatalities, particularly in high-risk environments like construction or manufacturing. Beyond the human cost, the reputational damage to a business can be severe and long-lasting.
Higher Repair and Replacement Costs: Neglecting inspections can allow minor issues to develop into major faults. These may require costly emergency repairs or complete equipment replacement, expenses that could have been avoided through routine examinations.
Loss of Business and Clients: Clients often expect their contractors or suppliers to uphold strict safety standards. A failure to meet legal obligations like PSSR can result in lost contracts or blacklisting from future work, especially in regulated industries.
Increased Insurance Premiums or Invalidated Coverage: As mentioned, insurers may increase premiums or deny coverage entirely if a business can’t provide evidence of up-to-date PSSR compliance, placing a heavier financial burden on operations.
PSSR and Written Schemes of Examination (WSE) aren’t just a box-ticking exercise – they are an essential component of a responsible, safety-first approach to using pressure systems. The benefits of compliance are wide-ranging, from protecting human life to reducing costs and maintaining operational integrity. Conversely, the risks of neglecting these inspections can be devastating on multiple levels.